Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:59

Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
"An ADC for ADC Purists": League Of Legends Unveils Newest Champion, Yunara - TheGamer
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
How scientists discovered 200-million-year-old species thought to be extinct - MSN
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
'Cosmic miracle!' James Webb Space Telescope discovers the earliest galaxy ever seen - Yahoo
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
New research links changes in walking patterns to early Alzheimer’s - The Brighter Side of News
What’s next?
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Science-Backed Tips for Increasing Your Stamina at Any Age - Prevention
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: